Nepal in crisis: a nation without guardians

Nepal is facing an unprecedented political and social crisis, with the country teetering on the edge of chaos. Recent youth-led protests, sparked by a government-imposed social media ban and long-standing corruption, have escalated into violent clashes, leaving the nation without clear leadership or order.

With Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli’s resignation, all major parties struggling to assert authority, and public institutions under pressure, the country faces a situation reminiscent of “a Nepal without guardians.” Government offices have been targeted by protesters, airports shut down, and streets in major cities largely controlled by demonstrators. Citizens report widespread fear, with many fleeing urban areas in search of safety.

The lack of centralized authority has created a power vacuum. Questions loom over who will govern the country until the next elections. Protest leaders themselves acknowledge the challenge: even if officials are removed, without a system in place, maintaining law, stability, and essential services is impossible. Calls for “phase two” of the protests have raised debates about strategy, with some advocating legal frameworks and transparency reforms, while others push for more radical action.

Financial chaos has also emerged. Crowdfunding campaigns meant to support injured protesters are circulating without oversight, and discussions have begun about seizing assets from corrupt politicians, including funds in offshore accounts. Analysts warn that without proper governance, such moves risk creating further instability.

Experts emphasize that Nepal’s current situation mirrors a country left without guardians: no functioning government, no clear leadership, and citizens forced to fend for themselves in both safety and governance. Legal observers suggest that forming a unified representative body to articulate demands and negotiate with the remaining administrative machinery is critical to avoid further descent into disorder.

The international community watches closely. Human rights organizations have condemned the use of lethal force against protesters, while the UN urges Nepal’s leaders to restore rule of law and ensure citizens’ rights are protected.

As Nepal navigates this fragile moment, the question remains: how can a country rebuild when its guardians have stepped away, leaving citizens to face chaos on their own? The coming days may define Nepal’s political trajectory for years to come.